Joyce Msuya (OCHA) on Conflict-related food insecurity…

Thank you, President Bio, for this opportunity to speak on the critical issue of conflict-induced hunger.
The evidence from the latest Hunger Hotspots Report from the Global Network Against FoodCrises is clear: The world's most extreme food crises – including the famines in parts of theGaza Strip and Sudan – are driven primarily by armed conflict and violence. In SouthSudan, the risk of famine persists in some counties affected by localized violence.The more intense the violence, the worse the food insecurity. Attacks harming civilians andcivilian infrastructure leave fields abandoned, disrupt food supply chains, drive up prices anddestroy livelihoods.In Yemen, where 17 million are going hungry and another 1 million are forecast to, damageto infrastructure has impeded imports, ongoing conflict is displacing people and exacerbatingeconomic decline, while extreme humanitarian access constraints and insecurity limit aiddelivery in critical parts of the country.In Syria, agricultural production has been severely affected by damaged infrastructure,restricted access to farmland due to explosive ordnance, and high levels of displacement.Hunger is exposing people to greater risks of sexual exploitation and abuse and forceddisplacement as people struggle simply to feed themselves. Women are especially impacted,often going without to prioritize their families.In armed conflicts, international humanitarian law is clear: Civilians and civilian objects mustbe protected. The use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited. So isattacking, destroying, removing or rendering useless objects indispensable to civiliansurvival. Resolution 2417, adopted in 2018, reinforces these obligations.And in situations of violence in which the rules of war don't apply, international human rightslaw and minimum humanitarian standards play an equally vital role in preventing andaddressing hunger.
Humanitarian action is also essential to prevent and address hunger in conflict. Whenhumanitarian access is denied, hunger and malnutrition rise – often with devastatingconsequences for civilians.Conflict parties must allow the rapid and unimpeded passage of impartial humanitarian reliefand ensure humanitarians have the freedom of movement needed to carry out their work.Resolution 2417, as well as resolution 2730, adopted last year, reiterate these duties.One month into the ceasefire in Gaza, the UN and our partners are seizing every opening tosave lives. Millions of meals have been provided. Nutrition sites have reopened, and somemedical services have resumed, among other progress. But access is still restricted by limitsat border crossings, delays to aid convoys and bureaucratic impediments that slow the entryof vital supplies – and, in some cases, staff.In Sudan, conflict has shattered food systems and displaced millions. According to the latestIPC analysis, more than 21 million people are facing high levels of acute food insecurity –the largest such crisis in the world. Yet many areas remain inaccessible to humanitarians.People trapped between front lines are cut off from assistance and enduring extreme hunger.The UN, including OCHA, works relentlessly to secure humanitarian access. We negotiatewith parties to conflict, operate notification systems to inform armed actors abouthumanitarian movements, and coordinate responders on the ground. But these tools can onlywork if parties are committed to facilitate access and aid operations.
The record number of attacks harming aid workers over the past two years – and the knock-on effect on communities' access to relief – is appalling. I call on States to condemn these attacks and push for consistent, credible investigations in every context.Reducing bureaucratic hurdles also facilitates access: simplifying entry procedures forhumanitarian staff, speeding up permits for relief supplies and enabling safe movement.Clearance of unexploded ordnance is another practical enabler, allowing aid to reach peoplesafely and helping farmers return to their land. And humanitarian funding remains essential tosustain operations.Finally, without political will, even the best coordination, negotiation and funding will fallshort. Preventing and ending hunger is not simply a logistical or financial challenge; itdemands sustained political engagement.I want to propose four areas of action for this council and UN Member States:First, use your leverage to address hunger in conflict. This means sustained political dialogueand diplomatic engagement and using tools at your disposal to influence parties. As part ofthat, making compliance with international law a condition for arms exports is essential.Second, adopt strong policies and practices to protect civilians. Alongside implementing theirlegal obligations, we encourage Member States to join commitments such as the PoliticalDeclaration on strengthening the protection of civilians from the humanitarian consequencesarising from the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas and turning thosecommitments into real action
Third, facilitate humanitarian action by simplifying bureaucratic procedures and ensuringhumanitarians can engage all parties. Implement Security Council resolution 2730 on theprotection of aid workers, including the practical steps outlined by the Secretary-General.Fourth, strengthen accountability. Demand and support investigations; adopt legislation toprosecute war crimes; enhance inter-State cooperation; and where competent nationalauthorities are unable or unwilling to act, support international jurisdictions.Thank you.